Methodology v1.0
How SoulmateSign labels symbolic and factual claims
A public four-level method for distinguishing sourced facts, tradition, interpretation and personal reflection.
Published method · 2026-07-21
Words such as means, shows and proves can make a reflective practice sound more certain than its evidence. This methodology assigns every material claim to one of four levels before publication.
The label controls sourcing and wording. It does not rank a reader's beliefs; it tells the audience what kind of statement they are reading and what could reasonably support or challenge it.
The four claim levels
Level 1 is an observable or reproducible fact and needs an appropriate source or visible calculation. Level 2 describes a documented tradition and names that tradition. Level 3 is an interpretation framed as a possibility. Level 4 is a personal reflection presented as an optional prompt.
- Fact: ‘This calculator reduced 29 to 11 using the displayed rule.’
- Tradition: ‘In this tarot tradition, the card is associated with choice.’
- Interpretation: ‘The image may invite a conversation about choice.’
- Reflection: ‘What choice feels available to you?’
Language gate
Predictive certainty, mind-reading, diagnosis and guaranteed outcomes fail the gate. A sentence is revised until its grammar matches its evidence, or it is removed when no support exists.
Versioning and limits
Version 1.0 applies to public EN/ES editorial surfaces created on 21 July 2026. It is an editorial control, not a scientific study of symbolic practices. Changes must preserve prior versions so published wording can be audited against the rule in force at the time.
Continue exploring